Online Gambling Insider
Click For Home Page Set As Home Page Bookmark This Site Site Map RSS Feed - Latest Insider News And Bonuses
Insider Online Casinos
Online Gambling Casino iMEGA Best Online Casino
Casino Of The Month
Online Gambling Insider
USA Online Gambling
NFL Football Betting
Baseball Betting Guide
USA Online Gambling
USA Online Casinos
USA Casino Online
Best USA Casinos
American Online Gambling
Where You Can Play !!!
Restricted US States
UK Online Gambling
The Insider Blog
$1000 Gambling Guarantee
Online Casino Bonus
Online Gambling Reviews
Casino Payment Methods
Exclusive Interviews
Exclusive Casino Bonuses
Online Slots Guide
Online Gambling Offers

iMEGA


UIGEA


online gambling


DOJ


online gambling USA

 


Online Gambling Battle Of The Acronyms Heats Up - 08-01-07


August 1 - iMEGA (the Interactive Media and Entertainment Gaming Association) is a Washington not-for-profit group that was founded this year primarily to stop the dreaded UIGEA (Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act ) from being implemented in the United States, thereby restricting American's freedom to gamble online.

Yesterday, iMEGA filed an extremely important legal brief in New Jersey seeking a temporary restraining order (TRO) against the US Dept. of Justice, Federal Trade Commission and the Federal Reserve from implementing the Act. This is the first step in advance of a full-on challenge to the constitutionality of the law.

The brief itself makes compelling reading and is available online here.

iMEGA has the veiled support of the banks who clearly do not want to lose billions of dollars; the cost to them for becoming the government's watchdogs on this matter. It has been reported that the banks are not financing iMEGA directly.

It is certainly in the interests of huge online gambling firms such as PokerStars, FullTilt, and Bodog that this petition is ultimately successful. One hopes that these privately held companies are putting big money behind iMEGA because a lengthy court case that takes a couple of years to resolve itself would end up generating huge profits for them. Hint hint! The industry was already blindsided once and cannot afford to be lax and complacent again.

Without getting into the legal intricacies of the arguments against UIGEA's constitutionality it is clear that there is at the very least a reasonable case that can be presented against the US government.

One feels, however, that with the current weighting of the US Supreme Court: Pro-Bush 5 - Enlightened Human Beings 4 that a plea based on the liberty of US citizens under the First Amendment will almost certainly fail.

The WTO rulings against the USA and the threat of future sanctions may carry more weight, but a lot will depend on the strength of the banking-lobby in Washington to ensure that this Act is somehow stonewalled into oblivion.

The depressing conclusion is that superior legal arguments, the blatantly illogical position of the government in favoring certain forms of online gambling while banning others, and the refusal to allow US citizens to spend their own money in the way that they see fit will all be meaningless but may buy lobbyists enough time to do things the American way - make a bigger payoff than the first group of guys in order to make the UIGEA go away.


    Online Gambling Battle Of The Acronyms Heats Up - 08-01-07 Send To A Friend

Related Gambling Articles:
Online Poker Site Receives UK Problem Gambling Accreditation - 08-05-07
Sensational Slots Tournamanets at All Jackpots Online Casino - 08-04-07
Bet NFL Preseason For 2007 - 08-03-07
Neteller Finally Pays Back US Online Gambling Customers - 08-02-07
Partybets To Make World Homeless Soccer Cup Donation - 07-31-07
Newbie Wins Double Video Poker Jackpot At Online Casino - 07-30-07
Playtech Introduces Excellent New Online Casino Games - 07-29-07
Record High Progressive Jackpot At Bodog Online Casino - 07-28-07



Add This Gambling Article To:

  Del.icio.us   Digg   Google   Spurl
  Furl   Simpy   Y! MyWeb    OnlyWire
  Redit   StumbleUpon   Technocrati 

Copyright © Online Gambling Insider 2002-2008
Disclaimer
  2008/10/01